The Unspoken Truth About the 2025-26 FCS National Championship
The official announcement of the 2025-26 FCS National Championship game details—date, time, TV slot—are boilerplate administrative filler. They distract from the real story: the slow, agonizing erosion of significance at the Division I Football Championship Subdivision (FCS) level. While fans eagerly await the final showdown, the quiet reality is that the NCAA is actively managing this event toward obsolescence, prioritizing FBS expansion and media consolidation over true competitive parity. This isn't just another championship; it’s a bellwether for the stratification of college football.
The 'Why It Matters' of Mediocrity
Why should anyone care about the logistics of the FCS Football title game when NIL deals are reshaping the Power Five landscape? Because the FCS serves as the ultimate proving ground, and its diminishing spotlight signals a structural problem. The inherent talent gap is widening, fueled by massive media rights deals showering the FBS (especially the SEC and Big Ten) with capital. The FCS, meanwhile, is left fighting for scraps of attention. The official date and time are set by a system that no longer truly values this pinnacle of competition. It’s relegated to a time slot that maximizes convenience for broadcasters, not impact for the athletes.
Consider the history. The early days of the FCS championship were vibrant, showcasing genuine underdog narratives. Now, the same handful of perennial powers—North Dakota State, South Dakota State, Montana—dominate the conversation. This predictability kills viral potential. The college football narrative demands constant upheaval, and the FCS often fails to deliver the necessary chaos because the economic disparity stifles true, sustainable upsets.
Contrarian Take: The Real Losers of the Scheduling Game
The biggest loser in the current framework isn't the team that loses the final game; it's the mid-major FBS program that *could* have been elite but is instead trapped in a perpetual state of 'not good enough' to join the expanded top tiers. The FCS serves as a pressure release valve, absorbing talent that might otherwise challenge the established FBS order. The NCAA benefits from this arrangement: a highly competitive but contained secondary championship that doesn't threaten the massive revenue streams of the top 60 or so schools. This scheduling strategy is deliberate containment.
We must acknowledge that the visibility of the FCS National Championship is inversely proportional to the growth of the FBS playoff structure. As the FBS playoff expands to 12 or even 16 teams, the perceived importance of any non-FBS final diminishes. The trophy pictured on NCAA sites is becoming more of a historical artifact than a current obsession. For deeper analysis on the economic stratification of college sports, look no further than reports on media rights valuation, which clearly prioritize the FBS behemoths. [Link to a reputable source like a major business publication discussing college sports finance].
What Happens Next? Predicting the Next Five Years
My prediction is stark: Unless a major conference collapse occurs, the FCS championship game will cease to be broadcast on a major network by 2030. It will migrate entirely to streaming platforms owned by the same entities that broadcast the FBS games, effectively relegating it to 'premium niche content.' The few remaining competitive universities will face immense pressure to transition to the FBS, even if it means immediate financial strain, viewing the FCS title as a dead end. The only way the FCS regains relevance is if the FBS implodes or if a unified players' union forces revenue sharing across all divisions, a highly unlikely scenario in the current climate.
The 2025-26 contest will be a well-played game, but it will be a performance for an increasingly smaller, more dedicated audience, existing in the shadow of the true power brokers of American football. [Link to a historical overview of FCS dominance to show contrast].